A philosopher is a man of thought and reason. When they are opposed to each other in different theories, there will be a debate of free discussion. In the end they will not agree on the most subtle points of view, which is their basic basis. Then they must act according to their own attitude. All of the above is very normal and inevitable. How to view the relationship between philosophers will be a philosophical question closer to the real essence. Their theories or selves are closely related to their own experiences, so it is not realistic to equate two very different people with ideas. The best attitude between different philosophers is to face oneself and improve one's multidimensionality from all the history of the universe. One can even adopt a way to include all aspects of the other and realize one's perception of the world as it really is. That's all I can think of and nothing else. In fact, the path of philosophy is free and endless, so just and appealing to those who want to discover the truth of the universe. All in all, it comes down to one sentence: go your own way and let others talk.
A philosopher is a person with thoughts and rationality. When they oppose each other in different theories, there will be a debate about free discussion. In the end they will not be consistent in the most subtle point of view, this is their basic foundation. Then they must act according to their own attitudes.
All of the above are very normal and inevitable. How to treat the relationship between philosophers will be a philosophical issue that is closer to the true essence. Their theory or self is closely related to their own experience, so it is not realistic to equate two people who are extremely different. The best attitude among different philosophers is to face themselves and to enhance their multidimensionality from the history of all the universe. They can even adopt a method to cover all aspects of each other and realize your true perception of the world. I can think of this and nothing else.
In fact, the path of philosophy is endless and free, so fair and attractive to those who want to discover the truth of the universe. All in all, this can be attributed to one sentence: take your own path and let others say it.
text:
A philosophyist is a thinking and rational person,when they versus each other in different thoery, It oft produce debates regarding as freely discusing.And to the end they would not concord with the most subtle point that is essential foundation of their,then,they must take a action to oher according with their attitude.
Above all it is very normal and inevitable,how to see through the relation between philosophyist would be more philosophy question that is more close to the true nature. Both the theory or self of theirs are severce relevent to their own experience, so letting extrem different two person equaling the thought is no reality.The most best attitude between different philosophyist is confront theirself and to enhance own mutipdimension from all universe histroy and even to take a method to encompass all the aspect of others opposite, achieving your own ackowledge to the true of the world. What i can think is this and no other can be done.
In fact, the road of philosophy is freely no-ending and so just and atractive to those who want unearth the mistry of the universe.Above all,it is attributed to the saying that walking your own road letting others just saying whatever something.
一個哲學家是一個有思想和理性的人。當他們在不同的理論中相互對立時，會產生自由討論的辯論。到最後他們不會在最微妙的觀點上一致，這是他們的基本基礎。那麼，他們必鬚根據自己的態度採取行動。
上述一切都是非常正常和不可避免的，如何看待哲學家之間的關係將是更加接近真實本質的哲學問題。他們的理論或自我都與自己的經驗密切相關，所以讓極端不同的兩個人等同思想也不是現實的。不同哲學家之間最好的態度是面對自己，並從所有宇宙的歷史中提升自己的多维性，甚至可採取一種方法來囊括對方的所有方面，實現你對世界真實的認知。我能想到的就是這個而且別無其他了。
事實上，哲學的道路是自由無止境的，對於那些想要發掘宇宙真相的人來說是如此公正和有吸引力。總而言之，這可歸結於一句話:走自己的路，讓別人說去吧。
Kommentarer